America is facing a historic fertility slump. Into that debate stepped the Economist with a November 6 feature titled “Make America procreate again: Among the MAGA fertility fanatics.”

The article by Barclay Bram framed pro-natal advocates as “tech bros and religious conservatives.” It highlighted a movement that urges having more children amid a collapsing birth rate.

Bram cited Joan Walsh of the Nation, author of “What’s the Matter with White People?” The piece quoted her view of the pro-natal push as “an insidious project to create a whiter America.”

Auron MacIntyre took the argument head-on on his show.

Auron MacIntyre said, “White children are the most evil thing that the left can imagine.”

He linked elite rhetoric to border policy and the protection of illegal immigration as a supposed fix for the birth rate slide.

Auron MacIntyre said, “They have no interest in you continuing to exist because they want to replace you,” he says frankly.

Bram opened with NatalCon, a pro-natalist gathering in Austin, Texas. He described meeting a 32-year-old single trucker named Tim Adkinson and portrayed the event as a strange meet-up of outsiders.

Auron MacIntyre said, “[He’s] literally demonizing people who are trying to solve social problems that are keeping us from having families,”

The feature also cast investments by billionaires in reproductive tech, and a Trump-era push to lower fertility-drug costs, as misguided or doomed. MacIntyre argued the criticism was rooted in identity politics, not outcomes.

Auron MacIntyre said, “Why is this insidious?”

Auron MacIntyre said, “Because white people might have kids,” he answers. “That’s why it’s evil. Yeah, they care about the future of the United States. Yes, they’re working to reduce drug prices and create situations where people can stay home with their children … but oh, some of those people might be white. And that’s the problem.”

He added that America’s demographic reality makes any genuine pro-family surge include more children from the current majority. He called the backlash irrational and biased.

Auron MacIntyre said, “But the Economist hates white people. It hates white babies. It doesn’t want white people to have children. They are interested in ethnic cleansing. That’s what they support.”

The magazine’s scene-setting included protesters outside the event. Faces covered, they shouted through a megaphone as attendees arrived. One sign equated natalists with eugenics.

Protesters shouted, “Nazis off our campus!”

A sign read “Eugenicists” with “Natalists” crossed through.

MacIntyre argued this reveals the left’s framing of basic family formation as extremist.

Auron MacIntyre said, “So if you want to have babies, you are a Nazi. You are doing Nazi race science if you would desire that Americans have more children. And this really just lays it bare. … Every white baby could be a Nazi. Whiteness is something that is inherently fascist, right? Nazism is sitting in white DNA, so we’ve got to get rid of the white people so we get rid of the Nazis.”

He tied the narrative to broader claims about a “replacement” storyline that critics dismiss but, he argued, show up between the lines of elite media coverage.

Auron MacIntyre said, “I keep having to hear there is no great replacement theory … no attempts to push white people out of the United States … except for the article is explicitly stating that every white child is an atrocity.”

At the heart of the fight is whether encouraging families is a civic good or a coded project. The Economist chose a mocking tone toward a movement wrestling with real-world costs, housing hurdles, and drug prices that make family life harder.

MacIntyre’s response was blunt. He said pro-family advocates are trying to solve visible problems, not wage culture war. He argued the press prefers to sneer instead of debate how to make marriage and child-rearing possible again.

The controversy won’t fade soon. Fertility is falling. Policymakers—from statehouses to Washington—are testing ways to lower costs and support parents. Whether the media treats that work fairly will shape the next round of this fight.